Wednesday, October 26, 2016

A Drawn Out Journey



"The aftertaste you leave with a reader is more important than the first and immediate last impressions if you want to have the reader coming back for more."
- Me while thinking about By the time you read this.

By the time you read this, by Giles Blunt, is a mystery-crime fiction novel that managed to get "the Best Mystery of the Year"-name/award by the Globe&Mail. I've never read any other novels by Blunt, but apparently his "Forty words of sorrow" was some kind of award winner also.

The story opens up with a description of a town (or some kind of area, maybe it was a small city even) called Algonquin Bay. The readers are immediately assured that nothing bad could ever happen in Algonquin Bay, which ofcourse means the complete opposite: something terrible must be on its way. On a second thought, though, after finishing the book, since the antagonist/villain had been wreaking havoc from the shadows for two long years, that particular opening statement about the town makes little sense.
John Cardinal is our main protagonist. He's a very experiences and skilled policeman out of suit who on paper comes out to be sort of a Gary Stu (praised to high heavens by the author and story's characters), but the twist in the story is that Cardinal is the one who all terrible things happen to, and he's left mentally exhausted, left to question himself about "what good is it to keep on living" as very early on in the story John Cardinal's wife, the beautiful and perfect Catherine dies by what is considered to be a certain suicide. That's what I as a reader also believed - and hoped - to have been the case, atleast until the ending portion kicked in where everything sort of gets explained... And I can't say that things were explained in a "good" way, really.

Giles Blunt is an excellent writer when it comes to expressing how things would look like in order to create the imaginery for the reader, he's also great in atmospheric build-up, realistic writing and grammar. However the story felt too in-my-face realistic when it came to spending my time in telling how even the smallest things seemed and were like - truly alot of trivial things in the text - that I just couldn't keep myself invested. At times it felt as if I was doing homework, in other words it was exhausting to read. Also in this story Blunt seems to fall short in having any sort of imagination required to tell a compelling fictional story, as By the time you read this had a guidebook crime drama plot and story. The whole story was uninspired to no end, side plotlines (well, the only one there was) were handled in a boring manner while Blunt tried to present them as something huge and special, he failed in executing the promises. He failed reaching up to those standards he himself set for the story. There was nothing much going on in the story either as I spent hours trying to get through it.

After John Cardinal leaves a plotline with the Algonquin Bay's mayor's adultery investigation hanging (never to be continued again in the story. This is the first thing that happens after the opening segment, also),Cardinal gets a notice while on a stakeout with the mayor that a woman has jumped off a 10-story building to her death. When Cardinal arrives to the crime scene, he immediately goes to grab the woman with broken bones and holds her - a moment which may or may not make the reader feel some form of emotion. I didn't feel a thing, not because of its amazing plot weaving (which it didn't have) or just because of the fast pacing and skipped character fleshing out in order to get to that point but because of the unnatural amount of hard-to-understand words that Blunt filled the text with in order to build up atmosphere - words that someone who doesn't have english as their first or second mother language may find frustrating trying to decipher. The alien words used weren't what made the story fristrating for me however.

After Cardinal finds his dead wife - soon after the story begins - the story falls into a downward spiral

of simply boring storylines, bad handling, lame climax and laughable resolution, putting it simply.
Aside from the less than memorable characters, the only ones who I could remember while reading, I could probably count with one hand. The MC, John and his wife and their emotional support daughter Kelly who didn't really have any personality going for her, Lise Delorme - John's perfect colleague, the antagonist who brings another layer of weird writing into the story. The antagonist is hailed, by award giving groups, to be on par with Hannibal Lecter's tier of great villainous characters and... Not even close.  The story is filled with somewhat annoying coincidences in the plotlines that it'd be arguably better without the antagonist, but another problem in the story makes me regret saying that, that problem being pacing.

As I mentioned previously, the story takes a dive not soon after it begins, and most of it has to do with the lack of any interesting or entertaining characters with quirks or interesting and suspensful plotlines. Everything is so blank, depressing in a boring way. The story consists of John Cardinal and his daughter Kelly trying to deal with Catherine's death and depression.
 John Cardinal is on leave from work at the PD where the 2nd most important character of the story, Lise Delorme, is trying to crack an old case about a sexual predator. The side plotline is handled in a pretty lackluster way and it doesn't leave any type of taste with the reader, it's just Delorme going around talking with people to get hints at who the guy could be, and the guy just happens to be indirectly connected to the main antagonist, in other words it's unnecessarily mixed in with the main plot. Anyways, as Cardinal tries to find a good coffin for his late wife and also a strange guy who sends him threatening letters regarding Cardinal failing to protect Catherine, the reader will spend a good 200 pages reading rather empty text that, aside from atmosphere, doesn't build-up to anything in the long run. The writing oversaturated the story with trying to tell how things are like. The characters weren't that great either as I previously mentioned, so reading so much "meh" slice-of-life about them did not do the story any favours. The drama in the story also felt like it was some kind of crime-drama trope that was being used. 
Most of the enjoyment I remember getting while reading came from trying to guess what will happen next in the story (though that would mean that something actually happens which really isn't the case in this book), and then after dozens of pages of nothing happening, the thing that I had guessed would happen, happens, that's when I just laughed at how stupid the whole thing seemed like. 

Last notes.
The chapters were nicely short, easy to read to a "checkpoint."
The story was unnecessarily left open-ended, but not in a good way. It felt like the author got bored with the story, tried explaining things while forgetting to give closure to things, and just wrote that it's over here and everything is good.
The last dozen or two dozen pages of the book is a taste read of Giles Blunt's next book. The genre seemed to be completely different and the characters seemed to actually have some life to them, despite seemingly being archetypal characters with quirks. Atleast they were noticeably more lively compared to the characters in the main story of the book.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

A Technically Perfect Ending

I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had. J. K. Rowling
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/remembered.htm"
I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/jkrowlin454004.html?src=t_remembered
I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/jkrowlin454004.html?src=t_remembered
I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/jkrowlin454004.html?src=t_remembered
I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/jkrowlin454004.html?src=t_remembered
I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/remembered.html
I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had. J. K. Rowling
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/remembered.html
"I would like to be remembered as someone who did the best she could with the talent she had."
- J.K. Rowling 

Curtain. The final released Poirot novel by Agatha Christie. I already made a somewhat spoilery (the post has a picture with a spoiler) respect post about the book earlier here but now that I've completed the book last month and gathered my thoughts about it, I ofcourse want to write a bit about it. According to Wikipedia, Christie wrote the story ~30 years before the actual ending and had it stored in a bank during World War 2 to keep it safe. Curtain's purpose was to act as a "fitting" end to the series, which it in some ways is and in some ways isn't.

The setting and certain resurfacing ideas used in the book's story are, some more than others, symbolistic. The very first case and setting of the Hercule Poirot series is brought back in this final book as Hercule's old friend, captain Arthur Hastings, stars as the main character of the story. Hastings's purpose according to Poirot is to work as Poirot's five senses for trying to solve the case of the mysterious culprit "X," a person who Hercule Poirot says is his most formidable foe yet (X's presence was not presented as well as it could have been, though, for this to be all too true), who had "killed" multiple people in the past and is now hunting for more. Since the beginning Poirot knows everything of X, while Hastings knows practically nothing (well Poirot told him his few potential victims - as to hint at X's murder methods) and is looking for the culprit X and his murder methods in that way, while knowing nothing. In other words Poirot is missing clues for the culprit's methods as he can't prove X's part in the killings, and he is also looking for X's next victims, so he wants Hastings to look at the people of the newly remodeled Styles's Court building construct (from the first Poirot case) from inside-the-box point of view, and he wants Hastings to report everything he sees to Poirot himself.

Chavenage House (near Tetbury, Gloucestershire). Inspiration for Styles Court
Styles's Court is now a place for for people in need of extra help to continue their lives with help to live in, also with some extra guests that just come to relax there and spend some time. In other words the mansion has been turned into a nursing home.

The premise of the story is the usual; it has a place and a case. Arthur Hastings gets a letter from Hercule Poirot in which he wants Hastings to come to meet Poirot for old time's sake. One of Hastings's daughters, Judith, and a slew of other people are already waiting for him (well not really but they're there), and Hastings really wants to meet Poirot once more. Hastings's memories and nostalgia - the shared history with Poirot - is brought up multiple times. The cast of characters in the story is nothing spectacular but Christie does a well enough job in bringing the characters up multiple times for the reader to get used to who most of  them are. When I began to read the book at first, I felt very lost on who is who, but thinking back to the previous chapters made it easier to get into the flow of the story. The story itself is very basic, in fact so much so that it felt disappointing. It didn't take much (while reading I didn't mind it at all) from my enjoyment but I did think that the setting - a mansion in which a group of people are in, locked room murder and multiple other murders - and other such things were terribly uninspired and from that front not the best way for the curtain to fall. In this case I think Christie saw very far into the future (if the "writing 30 years before the actual ending" thing is true) when she wrote Curtain, as it was the perfect soft-boiled setting and the premise of the story with Poirot's age etc. being brought up for the case. However these things were too perfect for their own good as nowadays these are rather overused ideas to say the least.


Characters? They were okay. No one really outstanding, but Hastings's thoughts and personal motivations were well handled in this. Poirot's moments were pretty nice in a good and bad sense, I believe, while thinking back. There was a a particularly powerful line about dropping the curtain which Poirot himself made that sticks with me still. Dr John Franklin stood out in his slightly sudden character development ways also and Boyd Carrington was interesting. I guess Judith's attitude and the way the true culprit was handled in the backgrounds was impressive, very much so. I didn't think the story was as well thought out until the bomb was dropped in the end. Some may see it as a psychological babble but I believe that Christie simply didn't know how to put the methods the culprit used into better words (the murder method was put in very simplistic ways during the explanation), but, as far as mystery/detective fiction, instead of sci-fi, goes, it was handled better than in the story I'll be writing a review about after this - a story in which there's a therapist and suicide talk, alot.

The story repeats an old-to-new type of writing where Hastings and other characters compare past to
Past and present overlap with each other.
present, in more ways than one, probably on purpose to reflect on their journey. Despite Hercule Poirot's bad and near-death condition, he keeps telling Hastings that his brain works as fast as always. Hastings questions this couple of times: "maybe Poirot has gone senile and is only making up this story of X?" You could tell where the story was going. It was to be the final Poirot book, Poirot's condition, and ofcourse getting to know the culprit etc. by the end was also a given, but how the story unfolds is another thing. In the end Poirot had to send a letter after all to explain everything, which was disappointing despite the somewhat emotional open-ended ending which came before it. Had the book told more in the epilogue, it could have turned out to be better. It feels like the ending part was added on random to avoid backlash.

And finally, you'll probably not guess the culprit on your own. they're the one I least suspected. they weren't brought up that often. The hints were low in count but the hints that exist in the story were really subtle.